Danger of pesticides and the EPA test is a terrible plan for children
Image : http://www.flickr.com
Pesticides are a ubiquitous toxin in our environment. We release the spray on the ants and spiders in our houses, their use in our gardens and lawns, fog our streets with them to kill mosquitoes, extending even to our bodies, so that the error has disappeared.
Farmers use 1.5 billion pounds of pesticides per year and most of them were EPA as a carcinogen.
But that's not all. U.S. farmers used 1.5 billion pounds of pesticides each year there are approximately 1.5 billion poundsPesticides sprayed on Foods we eat and our children. And not only fruits and vegetables, meat, because they contain pesticides, Food and feed, the very colorful.
In addition, pesticides are many consumer products such as paints, cosmetics, Food Foodpyramidguru.com/food-pack” title=”Food Pack”>packaging, textiles, rugs, mats and have been used. And they are widely used in parks and other recreational areas, golf courses are among the biggest offenders in one yearbe used for seven or eight times the pesticides in the comparable size of agricultural land.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has registered nearly 900 pesticides that are formulated over 20,000 products, according to the Coalition of Northwest for Alternatives to Pesticides.
Approximately 60 per cent of herbicides, 90 percent against 30 percent of fungicides and insecticides are known to be carcinogenic, the EPA said, and pesticides that poison our groundwater, air and ourMost foods we eat.
What are the health effects of these pesticides?
Studies in animals and humans have individual pesticides that contribute to the alarming number of health problems, as indicated:
* Cancer
* Problems with fertility
* Brain Tumors
* Lesions in Children
* Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Congenital Abnormalities *
* Skin and eye irritation
* Hormones or endocrine problems
* The damage to the nervous system
Children areparticularly vulnerable to the toxic effects of pesticides. Their bodies are still developing and immature, making it sensitive to such damage. In fact, studies by the National Academy of Sciences and the Environmental Working Group, we have found that children exposed to pesticides are carcinogenic at high risk of future cancer and other studies have shown that the use of pesticides with an increased risk of malignant disorders of childhood has been associated.
Knowing this information, I believe, therefore, asappalling that we kill our children shampoo with pesticides for lice.
But these negative effects were mainly on studies that are generally a concentration of pesticides. So, who investigated the cumulative effects on the body of individual pesticides, we are exposed, and we consume over the years?
EPO testing pesticides on children?
That children are exposed as vulnerable to pesticide exposure precisely why the EPA decided to study, andBack in October 2004, they received 2.1 million dollars to do exactly that. Who were the one who carries large quantities? American Chemistry Council, a chemical industry front, with big wigs such as Monsanto, Exxon and Dow.
Two-year study entitled Children's Environmental Exposure Study (Applause) will determine control of the baby low income families, these chemicals can be ingested or inhaled by children, children under 3 years are absorbed, and impacts on health, by. CAUSE
The families of pesticides EPA CHEERS study, T-shirt, video, bibs, calendars receive a framed certificate, newspaper and 970th $
What is surprising is that the EPA has decided to bite the very serious study, "Cheers names." Participants in the study will be $ 970, T-shirts, bibs, receive for their baby, diary, journal, framed certificate of recognition and camcorders.
Although the study did not, by participating in pesticides in the evolution of theirFrom home, or they detect other chemicals, which show that the use of these toxic substances in their homes. Opponents fear that low-income families to use pesticides to only participate in the study.
They also noted that since the study is funded by industry, there is a conflict of interest. Most of the effects of pesticides, which are considered in the long term it is unlikely that harmful effects are felt in the short-term study.The result is that the chemical industry to fight against the EPA study detected pesticides safely and try to relax the rules for their use.
EPA Pesticide Scientist said, Troy Pierce, "It looks like it goes against the EPA recommends the use of [pesticides] related to children. Paying families in Florida and the country regularly treated with pesticides is very sad when we know that the EPA [pesticide management] should always be used to protectChildren. "
In November 2004, a study has been delayed, mainly because of public debate that arose around him, is for "final exam", but went as planned for spring 2005.
This is certainly a step in the right direction, that EPA has reviewed the measures the effects of pesticides that we are all exposed. However, compensation includes expected "to attend this very important study, some unusual products: T-shirt, bib and timing? Evenunusual names (applause!), which may explain why the public was so shocked when it seemed that the industry-funded studies are trying to shoot in low-income families, to their use of chemical control, the government knows they are toxic.
What good news?
The good news in all this, and it is: Is it possible to reduce exposure to pesticides (although this is true) can be reduced to zero. The best way to achieve this are:
*
Buy CertifiedNon-organic fruits, vegetables and meat (do not forget to wash food, crops grown commercially especially before eating thoroughly with a diluted soap solution)
*
Avoid the use of toxic pesticides in homes and gardens (opt for natural pesticides, which can be found in health food store instead)
*
Do not use pesticides for cosmetic purposes, such as dandelions in the grass
* Do not use chemical repellents, lice shampoo or
Tags : Food Pack
Related posts:
- Danger of pesticides and the EPA test is a terrible plan for children
- Children with food allergies
- Food retailing in preparation for FDA food recalls – 9-step plan
- Businesses Healthier Snack Foods – Good Business Strategy
- Delicious Children's Fast Food Delivery to your door!
Posted on February 5th, 2010 by Food Pack
Filed under: Food Pack
Pesticide residues more threat to children:
A particular amount of pesticide residue in food that may be tolerated by an adult is harmful for a child and this depends on the body weight. This fact could be generalized for all food products and particularly for vegetables and fruits. The body tolerance of a 20 Kg child is quiet different than a 80 Kg adult. The other reason for lower tolerance threshold for children as compared to adults is using less diverse food by children. Consuming more diverse food and particularly more diverse vegetables and fruits inducts a higher level/ more diverse metabolizing/ detoxifying enzymes in body. These metabolizing enzymes like Cytochrome P-450 based Monooxygenases (also called Mixed-Function Oxidases)(MFOs) are developed more and more in body as age increases. One other factor is more exposure of children to toxic compounds compared to adults, behaviors like curling, jumping and generally more activity in children expose them more and more to toxic surfaces everywhere in home, school, play gardens etc. and these are scientifically documented facts now.
Pregnant ladies and elderly are also more sensitive to pesticide residues and must have minimum exposure to these compounds. Now there are scientifically documented evidence that toxic compounds from mother’s body can pass through the placenta (controversial to the past evidence that was wrong) and many toxic compounds are found the meconium (the first stool of a baby) (David Suzuki Foundation, 2006).